How many times have you wandered on the psychological path to ascertain the cryptic meaning of ‘who am I’? As you are reading this article, hence, chances are more than once. Well, in the socio-academic world that we live in today, the meta-analysis on this subject are positively, and consistently, predisposed towards us. Psychologists are further inclined to discover the true meaning of life than ever before in history.
In the old Grandpa’s time, the charade of ‘who am I’ hadn’t stemmed yet. People were still quite perplexed by thinking of ways to endure extreme heat without any fans or air conditioners, cooking efficiently on chulhas, and avoiding domestic snags for mere five rupees.1
Amid the lavish lifestyles facilitated by the growth in the global economy and the fact that, as a society, we are expansively girded by astonishing scientific breakthroughs, our communal problems have evolved to a large extent. Our generation possesses better communication systems than any other ancient civilization. Our defense arrangements, food systems, and medical facilities have significantly improved compared to any other time in history. We can have access to any relevant information within seconds. And we know more about our universe than ever before.
Back in the 2nd century, Ptolemy’s geocentric model, which assumed Earth as the center of the universe and that each planet moved by a system of two spheres, was not only a major communal belief but the only existing astronomical information.
Then, around the 15th century, the Scientific Revolution began alongside the works of Nicolaus Copernicus and Galileo Galilei, and they eradicated numerous false beliefs prevalent in society.
The baton was then passed over to arguably the most influential physicist of the modern world – Isaac Newton (and his legendary apple). Newton technically fashioned the design of modern-day science through Principia, and two of his other publications, thereby marking the beginning of the Age of Enlightenment.
Since then, numerous scientists, scholars, and philosophers such as Nikola Tesla, Albert Einstein, William James, and, more recently, Stephen Hawking, have made enormous contributions to science and exploration. Their discoveries have had an eternal influence on human minds.2
And by the virtue of this influence, there is a growing proclivity in affluent societies3 for deciphering the scientific meaning of life itself.
In clinically scientific terms, a human is a materially composed individual with the ability to feel, think, perceive, infer, interpret, observe, act, and value things. The human body is a dynamic creation with psychological and moral capabilities, which change and grow while interacting using the vast network of the brain.
In an age where machine learning and artificial intelligence are marketed as the new dawn in technology and are designed to learn from humans themselves, the abiding quandary of ‘who am I’ is like an insult to the borderline epidemic of science.
And here is a thing about people with a scientific mindset: they worship facts and evidence. However, about simplifying the meaning of life and its purpose, there is only so much that science and subjective thinking can apprise.
Besides, facts and evidence have limited viability for accurately ascertaining an individual’s identity4, as the system of observing such facts and evidence is always contentious on the grounds of cognitive bias.5
Nevertheless, even if science somehow apprehends a way to defeat cognitive biases, yet, its conclusions about the meaning and purpose of life would be strenuous to verify on the entire human race, let alone on those who are dead. And a fact that deciphers a perplexing query, as such, the true meaning of life, must be universally valid, in all regions, under all situations, at every point in time.
Philosopher Karl Popper, in 1959, argued that no fact, theory, principle, or experiment can ever be proven. He highlighted that all theories and principles are based upon some degree of a faith-based assumption. An assumption that the outcomes of experiments would always be similar to the original discoveries.6
One of the best illustrations that I find in Karl’s arguments is about the rising of the sun. According to science, the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, since forever, and no one has ever had a contrary experience. However, this doesn’t prove that the sun will continue to rise in the east forever. All it does is tell us the overwhelming probability of the sun rising in the east.
Therefore, though science provides us with the most sustainable form of hope for growth and a better life, ascertaining universal human identity and a meaningful purpose of life, using a scientific mindset, is inherently delusional.
On the other hand, another major borderline epidemic that has deep roots in history and has been abiding ever since is spirituality. Spiritual practices traditionally outlined a religious process of reformation aimed at recovering the original shape of a man. As exemplified by numerous founders and sacred texts of the religions of the world, such practices were oriented toward the image of God.
In spiritual terms, a human body is only a cluster of nature’s five elements. And after death, the body is merged back into nature itself. According to many religious beliefs, the soul, a holy spirit of God, is the true essence of every being in this universe.
Thousands of years ago, before the birth of any spiritual religion, humanity was pretty fucked up. There were wars, rapes, and mass crusades. People used to kill each other for a piece of bread. Slaves were bought and sold. And people born in poverty almost certainly died in poverty. There was no growth and no hope of life getting any better.
You and I think we have life problems, but imagine living in such a time. Scary, huh?
Back then, a belief in the supernatural deity was the only thing that instilled hope, that restrained people from killing themselves. Because being alive sucked, people constructed hope in the afterlife. They constructed the stories of heaven and hell, of Gods and devils.
As there were no preset rules to approach one’s life, they also invented stories about what God wants and the things we should and should not do. Today, we recognize those rules as rituals.
The funny thing about rituals: people change them all the time. Some of them, those that sucked, are even abolished. For instance, human sacrifice is something that was done in almost every ancient civilization, to feel salvation or to impress an angry God or too. However, with time, people realized that it sucks, and therefore, abolished it.
Many religious sentiments are preached in our world. Each of them manifests a separate idea about life, the responsibilities of a man, and grants us a system that connects daily experiences with a coherent whole. Religions proclaim a universal structure to one’s life and play a critical role in constructing meaning out of extreme hardship.
However, here is an undeniable fact. Every religion is fundamentally only a sentiment once zeroed to reason. A story that we tell ourselves over and over again to feel salvation. A narrative that people invent to create a sense of something greater than themselves.
Indeed, religious stories can never be proven or disproven. And because we need such stories, every religious fanatic or a self-proclaimed spiritual guru or a person indulged in the business of spirituality7, and all dignified visionaries are preoccupied with the belief of a greater meaning to one’s life, a greater purpose, the will of God, and shit like that.
I don’t know how to put this gallantly, but here is the truth: we are all completely insignificant creatures. Individually, we are a very tiny cluster of atoms with several billion atoms living on a very small dust particle somewhere in a desert. And nobody knows how big the desert is really.
Not only do we not serve any great purpose, but there is no great purpose. So, relax. Here, have some MacFries and a Diet Coke.
As humans, we construct these value-based stories to determine something as more important than everything else. To identify something as worth pursuing, something worth dying for, and something to justify our actions.
And please don’t get any wrong ideas. This is not an argument for nihilism. Infact, this is an argument to defy nihilism, in all its forms.
Now, before I decipher the meaning of life on earth for you, first we must solve the enigmatic query of ‘who am I.’
For humans, the most subtle form of expression is emotions. Higher emotional intensity is what we fundamentally desire, irrespective of our dreams or goals. Whether you want to build yourself an empire, become the best teacher, travel to mountains to meditate, take vacations, have amazing relationships, fight elections, smoke cigarettes, take LSD pills, drink alcohol, have sex, or worship God, your initial objective is higher emotional intensity.
When we are born, our Intensity curve is something like this because our experiences are mostly constant. Our life is pretty much: eat, sleep, cry, and poop.
Then, as we grow up, our intensity curve begins to fluctuate according to our experiences. We develop a rationale for basic knowledge, and through our lifetime, we further build upon that knowledge.
When you win a cricket match for your junior school team, your emotional intensity gets high. Then your father scolds you for playing cricket the whole day, and your emotional intensity gets low.
Then you become a school topper, and the emotional intensity is back high again. However, once you are at the top, it all seems meaningless. Therefore, you try to keep the intensity high through other means. Maybe bunk school to visit a beautiful lake. But, ultimately, your teachers and parents figure it out, and they punish you. Hence, you feel like an inferior piece of shit, and emotional intensity is back low again.
You fall in love and the intensity skyrockets, but eventually, it doesn’t work out too well, or maybe not well at all, and the intensity rock bottoms.
Well, you get the point. Right?
Life is essentially a struggle for intensity. And it is at the time of fluctuations in the intensity curve that we determine which experiences are more desirable and which are undesirable. With the fluctuations in the intensity curve, we form a distinction between good and bad for ourselves. That’s how we create our life values, beliefs, and principles.
In other words, we spin a bunch of stories for and around ourselves. This network of our stories is our identity. And our identity is what we are.
Oh! Come on, Aashish… you didn’t write this 3000-word article to tell me that my identity is the network of my values and that is who I am. Did you?
To this, my sweet friend, I say: NO. I didn’t.
Now let’s talk about our identity crisis. Identity crisis, in other words, can be remarked as an absence of validation. And validation in itself is a mirage chased by every goddamn religion of the world.
Religion is not only a community with a belief in supernatural controlling power or a God but every community with a set of its own beliefs and values is a religion. Therefore, Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity, or Islam are not the only religions. Nihilism, Atheism, Communism, and Nationalism are also religions.
Individually, we are all a sort of entity with our own bunch of sweet values and beliefs. Therefore, every human being is a small religion.
The only difference between you and, say, Hinduism is that the values and beliefs of Hinduism have been accepted by people at large, which provides it with a community. However, if you can write a great book or deliver a persuading radical speech (like Hitler gave to Germans to make-believe of their greatness) which induces people to accept your beliefs and values, you would have a community too.
Adolf Hitler was a religion way before he convinced anyone about anything. It was just that his values and beliefs were later accepted by people at large, and thus his religion became popular. Similarly, in India, Narendra Modi is a religion. But he is not a religion because he is the Prime Minister. He was a religion way before that. However, he was elected as Prime Minister because he managed to sell his values and beliefs to the people at large. People accepted his values and beliefs because they gave them hope of a better future. (Talk of Adolf Hitler and Narendra Modi in the same paragraph: pun totally unintended)
Every individual, small organization, or entity is drawn towards the set of values and beliefs that gives them the best hope of a better future.
Spiritual religions are popular because they provide hope for a better future. Science is the growing modern religion because it provides hope for a better future. Philosophers, radical activists, politicians, self-help writers, or the so-called motivational speakers can sell their values and beliefs to people by combining them with the hope of a better future.
There are three types of religions: Spiritual, Ideological, and Individual (Interpersonal).8
Needless to mention that all religions are nothing but stories. Stories constructed to generate a sense of meaning for ourselves. And these stories are not only questionable but subject to falsifiability. Therefore, every religion seeks validation. Because the absence of validation causes an identity crisis – a loss of hope.
You and I, we are whatever we identify as ourselves. If we choose to identify ourselves with the mind, we are the mind. If we choose to identify ourselves with our emotions, we are the expression of our emotions. And if we choose to identify ourselves as a soul, we are a soul – an essence of God himself.
Ultimately, it is the story or stories that we choose to accept for our hope of a better future that influences our values and beliefs. And it’s the network of our values and beliefs who we are.
It’s the absence of validation on our stories that prompts us to think it’s not enough. It makes us believe that there is something more to our lives than what meets the eye.
If I have to give you the biggest secret of life, then it will be something like this: “The idea that life is inherently meaningless is a story constructed by the mind. And anything that we say or do to defy this narrative is also nothing but a story. However, life grants us inherent freedom, i.e., we can spin any story that helps us to construct an acceptable meaning for ourselves. Moreover, spinning a story for ourselves is not merely an option. It’s a prerequisite.”
Every person is born with this inherent freedom to spin whichever story they want to construct hope. Every entity here is liberal when it comes to choosing their values and opinions.
Even the stupidest and most wicked people in history had this freedom to choose whatever meaning they anticipated for their lives. Adolf Hitler had this freedom, and so did Joseph Stalin. Hitler had a self-made story revolving around Germany’s greatness, and Stalin had his bunch of widespread bullshit. While their chosen stories were the cause of nearly 85 million deaths9, they were never really deprived of the freedom to choose or alter their stories.
The terrorist groups and inhumane organizations in effect today also have the freedom to spin the story of their choice. Every political party, social organization, and big corporations have this freedom. And paradoxically, every mass movement and communal protest is a result of two or more stories in conflict with each other.
As I said, the idea that life is meaningless is also a story. Therefore, nihilism is also nothing but a story. Similarly, atheism, communalism, and nationalism are all stories.
Whether you believe that being successful is the meaningful purpose of life or you feel that being joyful is the true essence of being alive, you are choosing to spin a story for yourself to create some sort of meaning that stops you from committing hara-kiri.
Because if we don’t even have a meaning to our life, a hope of a better future, then what’s the point of living after all?
The meaning that we choose for our lives gives us hope for a better future. And once this hope is lost, the mind is unable to sense a direction and reason for living. Our hope is our reason that we use to overcome hardships and struggles.
People with suicidal thoughts are, therefore, only an instance of lost meaning in life. It’s an effect caused when their chosen story fails to deliver on its purpose.
About seven years ago, my story failed to deliver meaning, to generate a sense of hope, and as a result, I found myself squabbling on the bathroom floor in an anxious attempt to kill myself. Fortunately, my attempt failed due to a minor technical error, and I received an opportunity to reconstruct a story for myself.
Every new story acts as a new beginning, a new life. And a new life is what every person with suicidal anxiety needs. Something better to pursue and identify oneself. Whether you believe you are a great writer, an academic scholar, a rockstar musician, or a beautiful band player, you are spinning a story, a little value narrative, to identify the self.
Our stories of the past describe our identity, and our stories of the future paint our hopes. And it’s the ability and freedom to narrate and step into these stories, to live them for real, which are the true powers of life, and the true meaning of being alive.
Click to listen to this Article (Use Headphones) You probably would've heard about comfort zone…
It's almost been two months since the news headlines were flocked by the story of…
Sometimes I think of all the problems in this world and the plans I would…
While the bullshit Chinese Virus fucks every country and disposes us to spend no-body-really-knows-how-many-weeks at…
About two years ago, I met Isha (name changed), through a mutual friend, at a…
I was in the ninth standard when I first thought I had found true love.…